President Donald Trump’s approach to foreign policy has drawn global attention, but not in a positive way. Leaders in Russia, China, and North Korea are reportedly questioning his credibility.
The recent military parade in Beijing highlighted this tension. Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and Kim Jong Un celebrated Japan’s World War II surrender without formally including the United States. Observers said it reflected Trump’s declining influence on global affairs.
Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko also joined the event, underscoring the growing alignment of authoritarian regimes. Trump, representing the U.S., watched from afar, signaling a lack of respect from key international players.
Experts said the exclusion was intentional. “It was more than an oversight. It was a message that America under Trump is not a priority,” said political analyst Jane Wallace.
Trump’s earlier meetings have drawn similar criticism. During the Alaska summit, Putin dismissed his proposals and cut short negotiations, leaving the White House to spin the event as a diplomatic win.
China has also expanded its global role. Beijing offered support to India after Trump attempted high tariffs, reflecting a new approach to international relationships that sidelines the U.S.
North Korea continues its nuclear development without concern for Trump’s engagement. Pyongyang has learned that Trump can be flattered publicly but does not impact serious diplomatic talks.
Trump responded to the Beijing parade with a post on social media, writing sarcastically about Xi, Putin, and Kim conspiring against America. Critics said the message revealed insecurity rather than strength.
He also demanded acknowledgment of America’s role in World War II, emphasizing U.S. sacrifices in China’s fight for freedom. Analysts say this focus on recognition over leadership underscores the president’s global image problem.
Allies have adapted to Trump’s style, managing his ego quietly while conducting essential diplomacy elsewhere. European leaders reassured him after Anchorage, but real negotiations moved around him.
The administration lacks experienced foreign policy leaders. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have limited influence, and intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard focuses on internal disputes rather than global threats.
Without a coherent team, America struggles to present a steady approach abroad. Trump’s focus on personal branding in politics often overshadows strategic interests, experts said.
Observers warn that weak leadership emboldens adversaries. Russia, China, and North Korea continue actions that challenge U.S. power, while the president’s public behavior undermines credibility.
The United States’ historical role in defeating Japan and defending allies is overshadowed by current missteps. Analysts argue that global respect now depends on leadership consistency rather than past achievements.
Trump’s approach contrasts sharply with prior administrations that emphasized steady, coordinated foreign policy. Experts say the lack of direction makes the U.S. less influential on critical global matters.
Overall, Trump’s presidency has changed how the world views the U.S. Leaders who once respected American power now calculate interactions carefully, often ignoring the president’s influence entirely.
